ODN Conference Proceedings 2019

30/11/2019

Inquest Process • Under the 2019 Act the Coroner has enhanced  powers, such as: – Directing the answering of questions; – Direct production of documents, records, things  etc; – Failure to answer questions/produce articles etc  may lead to High Court proceedings to directing  compliance

Inquest Process • Having heard the evidence the coroner, or jury  as the case may be, returns a verdict which  establishes the answers to the foregoing  questions, and essentially the cause of death • The verdict may be relatively brief or take a  more extensive narrative form

25

26

Inquest Process • Common verdicts associated with cases where  nurses and midwives may be called to give 

Inquest Process • While recommendations may also be made,  again no blame may be attributed – either civil  or criminal

evidence include:  – Accidental death; 

– Death by misadventure;  – Medical misadventure;  – Suicide/Self inflicted death;  – Want of attention at birth;  – Stillbirth;  – Death by natural causes;  – Open verdict.

27

28

Giving Evidence • The primary purpose of the inquest is to establish  the circumstances of the death, and as such in  theory it should be an uncontentious exercise for  a witness whereby, they give an account of  relevant matters, and indeed this is what occurs  in most cases • However, some cases may be more contentious  where different witnesses have differing accounts  of what occurred • Additionally, the facility for certain persons to ask  questions can give rise to a degree of contention

Giving Evidence • Questions may be asked of witnesses by the  coroner.  • Also, any person who has a proper interest in  the inquest (a properly interested person) may  personally examine a witness or be legally  represented by a solicitor or barrister

29

30

5

Powered by